
"Integrity and integration are one and the same. You're describing a lack of integration between who you think you are and who you aspire to be."
"You don't think your way to a new way of living. You live your way to a new way of thinking."
"What part of you do you use to reach out to your partner? Do you reach out from the best in you? Or do you reach out from the part that feels inadequate or wants to hide?"
"We assume that intimacy hinges on acceptance and validation from our partner. We've confused 'good communication' with being understood the way we want and getting the response we expect. We never consider the kind of intimacy where we validate our own disclosures when out partner doesn't. We've distorted what intimacy is, how it feels, how much we really want it, and how best to get it. Once we realize that intimacy is not always soothing and often makes us feel insecure, it is clear why we back away from it."
~ David Schnarch, chapter 1, "Passionate Marriage"
This week, Mike and I started reading together through "Passionate Marriage", a book we read while we were engaged that has deeply influenced how we view marriage and relationships in general. Now that we're approaching our two-year anniversary, we decided to read through it again - together this time - and see how actually being married affects how we read the book.
One chapter in, and it is no less challenging than the first time around. Despite living with the concepts in this book for a couple of years now, I still struggle to fully be myself.
The central theme of the book, you see, is how to become more yourself, and hold onto yourself, while being married (or in a long-term relationship such as family relationships or friendships.) How do you share life deeply with another person - especially in those times when they might not always understand you or give you what you think you need? How do you grow in intimacy rather than grow in the number of topics you "just don't talk about" because those topics breed misunderstanding and offense?
A while back an engaged friend of mine asked me to define intimacy. I was well aware of the common ways we think of intimacy - knowing another person deeply, walking closely through life with another person. But what I said was this:
Intimacy is knowing yourself deeply, and offering that self freely to another person who also knows himself deeply and is freely offering that self to you.
Too often, I think, we think of close, intimate relationships as those in which we have a lot of common, those relationships where we feel understood, those relationships where we are constantly affirmed and validated.
There is nothing wrong with any of those things, indeed, they're all pretty nice to have in a relationship!
But I think we'd be lying if we said that our husband/wife/mother/father/friend/sister/brother *always* understood us, *always* validated us, *always* affirmed us, *always* got us.
And what happens in those moments when they don't?
That's what this book is about.
And that's still what I struggle with. I was telling Kelly last week, when we were talking about this, that the easiest people for me to talk to are the ones who affirm me throughout the conversation. I could care less whether they *agree* with me or not, but it's nice to know I'm being heard. It's nice, when I'm sharing something (especially something that requires me to be especially vulnerable), to have them say things like:
- "Mmmhmmm."
- "I hear ya."
- "How did that make you feel?"
- "That must have been hard for you."
- "You must feel really ___."
- "What next?"
Basically, anything that lets me know that this person is interested in what I have to say, is tracking along with me, and is "getting it" on a basic level. Again, I don't feel like they have to agree with me, I just like to know that they're not getting bored.
I think it's okay to want these things when I communicate with my friends and loved ones. But again, what happens when I don't get it? What happens when the person I'm talking to seems, for all intents and purposes, bored? What happens when we're on the phone and I can't see even their facial expressions and it seems like maybe they don't want to hear what I have to say (perhaps this is why phone calls are such a difficult medium of conversation for me)?
My usual response is to shorten the story, to leave out details, to finish quickly. If I think someone's not interested in what I have to say, I don't say it.
The problem is that I think a lot of times, people ARE interested in what I'm saying, but they don't show it or don't know how to show it. Meanwhile, I shut down, thinking they aren't really interested in me. And growing the relationship stops.
Re-reading the first chapter of "Passionate Marriage" made me wonder what it would look like if I just offered myself, whether or not it seems like anyone is interested? If I validated and affirmed myself, rather than expecting that from others?
I think I might talk a lot more.
And I think I might grow closer to a lot of people.
I don't think I'll ever morph into the kind of personality who just talks and talks and talks without ever being asked a question. But I think I can safely assume that my friends want to know me, and it's ok to just bring things up and talk about them without necessarily being asked. Even if those topics are hot-button topics or things that might not be popular. There might be some awkward moments, and maybe every now and then someone will even get offended or misunderstand me.
But I think that's ok. I don't want to be constantly crafting a version of myself that I present to the world, a version of myself that I think people want to see. I just want to be me.
Warts and all.
Posted under God, Life, Love Life, Musings, conversations
This post was written by Heidi on June 5, 2008